Online Essay Submissions

SLR Online submissions should be original pieces of timely scholarship on newsworthy topics of no more than 3000 words, inclusive of footnotes, and in a highly readable style accessible to a wide audience (see previously published Essays on SLR Online for examples). All citations should be in Bluebook format. Please submit an editable word processing document (.doc, .docx, .rtf, .otf, etc.) and NOT a PDF document.

Questions should be addressed to Evan Stein, Senior Online Editor for Volume 67, at online@stanfordlawreview.org.

Please leave your name off of your article (but included on your cover letter / CV and in the form below) for purposes of blind review. Note that our general ethics policy also applies to SLR Online submissions.

[To instead submit an Article for potential publication in the print edition of the Stanford Law Review, visit the articles submissions page.]

If you are responding to an article, please paste its url in this field
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Basic Information
Format: 12/22/2014
Author Contact
Location
Files
Maximum file size: 10 MB
Allowed extensions: doc docx odc pdf
Maximum file size: 10 MB
Allowed extensions: doc docx odc pdf
Maximum file size: 10 MB
Allowed extensions: doc docx odc pdf
 
Connect with SLR

Stanford Law Review on Twitter   Stanford Law Review on Facebook   Stanford Law Review on Google+   Stanford Law Review on Google+

SLR Mailing List

Subscribe to receive updates from the Stanford Law Review.

 
SLR in the News

The Economist mentions Urska Velikonja's forthcoming article Public Compensation for Private Harm in the cover article of its August 30 issue.

The Economist writes a column on Stephen Bainbridge's and Todd Henderson's article Boards-R-Us.

SCOTUSBlog cites Eric Hansford's Volume 63 note Measuring the Effects of Specialization with Circuit Split Resolutions in one of its Academic Highlight blog posts.

The Atlantic and The National Journal cite Jeffrey Rosen's SLR Online article The Right to Be Forgotten.

WSJ MoneyBeat writes a column about Urska Velikonja's forthcoming article Public Compensation for Private Harm.

Education Law Prof Blog discusses Joshua Weishart's article Transcending Equality Versus Adequacy.

The D.C. Circuit cites Statutory Interpretation from the Inside in Loving v. IRS (PDF).

Constitutional Law Prof Blog discusses Toby Heytens's article Reassignment.

Justice Scalia cites Beyond DOMA: Choice of State Law in Federal Statutes in his dissent in Windsor.

The New York Times mentions The Right to Be Forgotten in an article and its 6th Floor Blog.

Slate references The Drone as a Privay Catalyst.

The Atlantic cites Shireen A. Barday's article, Punitive Damages, Remunerated Research, and the Legal Profession.

The Ninth Circuit cites The Dead Past in Doe v. Reed (PDF).

The U.S. Supreme Court cites Life After Bilski in a unanimous decision in Prometheus Laboratories (PDF).

Symposium

The Civil Rights Act at Fifty
January 24-25, 2014

Watch videos from our 2012 Symposium on The Privacy Paradox: Privacy and Its Conflicting Values.