The Stanford Law Review is proud of its history and all of the editors who have served over the years. For a concise account of the beginnings of the Law Review, see, for example, John R. McDonough, The Stanford Law Review: In the Beginning, 20 Stan. L. Rev. 401 (1968).

Volume 67 Volume 66 Volume 65
Volume 64 Volume 63 Volume 62
Volume 61 Volume 60 Volume 59
Volume 58 Volume 57 Volume 56
Volume 55 Volume 54 Volume 53
Volume 52 Volume 51 Volume 50
Volume 49 Volume 48 Volume 47
Volume 46 Volume 45 Volume 44
Volume 43 Volume 42 Volume 41
Volume 40 Volume 39 Volume 38
Volume 37 Volume 36 Volume 35
Volume 34 Volume 33 Volume 32
Volume 31 Volume 30 Volume 29
Volume 28 Volume 27 Volume 26
Volume 25 Volume 24 Volume 23
Volume 22 Volume 21 Volume 20
Volume 19 Volume 18 Volume 17
Volume 16 Volume 15 Volume 14
Volume 13 Volume 12 Volume 11
Volume 10 Volume 9 Volume 8
Volume 7 Volume 6 Volume 5
Volume 4 Volume 3 Volume 2
Volume 1
Connect with SLR

Stanford Law Review on Twitter   Stanford Law Review on Facebook   Stanford Law Review on Google+   Stanford Law Review on Google+

SLR Mailing List

Subscribe to receive updates from the Stanford Law Review.

SLR in the News

The Atlantic mentions Keith Cunningham's article Father Time: Flexible Work Arrangements and the Law Firm's Failure of the Family.

Justice Scalia cites Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? Acts, Omissions, and Life-Life Tradeoffs in his concurring opinion in Glossip v. Gross.

Justice Breyer cites Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate in his dissent in Glossip v. Gross.

Justice Kagan cites Statutory Interpretation from the Inside in her dissent in Yates v. United States.

SCOTUSBlog references Mark Rienzi's SLR Online article Substantive Due Process as a Two-Way Street.

The National Journal praises Substantive Due Process as a Two-Way Street.

The Economist references The Drone as a Privacy Catalyst.

The Green Bag lauds Toby Heytens's article Reassignment as an "exemplar of good legal writing" from 2014.

The Economist mentions Urska Velikonja's forthcoming article Public Compensation for Private Harm in the cover article of its August 30 issue.

The Economist writes a column on Stephen Bainbridge's and Todd Henderson's article Boards-R-Us.

SCOTUSBlog cites Eric Hansford's Volume 63 note Measuring the Effects of Specialization with Circuit Split Resolutions in one of its Academic Highlight blog posts.

The Atlantic and The National Journal cite Jeffrey Rosen's SLR Online article The Right to Be Forgotten.

WSJ MoneyBeat writes a column about Urska Velikonja's forthcoming article Public Compensation for Private Harm.

Education Law Prof Blog discusses Joshua Weishart's article Transcending Equality Versus Adequacy.

The D.C. Circuit cites Statutory Interpretation from the Inside in Loving v. IRS (PDF).

Constitutional Law Prof Blog discusses Toby Heytens's article Reassignment.

Justice Scalia cites Beyond DOMA: Choice of State Law in Federal Statutes in his dissent in Windsor.

The New York Times mentions The Right to Be Forgotten in an article and its 6th Floor Blog.

Slate references The Drone as a Privay Catalyst.