Print Issues

Volume 62, Issue 2


Article

Deep Secrecy

by  David Pozen

This Article offers a new way of thinking and talking about government secrecy. In the vast literature on the topic, little attention has been paid to the structure of government secrets, as distinct from their substance or function. Yet these secrets differ systematically depending on how many people know of their existence, what sorts of…

Article

Commercializing Patents

by  Ted Sichelman

About half, probably more, of all patented inventions in the United States are never commercially exploited. Even many of the most commercially significant inventions take decades to come to market. In this Article, I contend that the patent system is substantially retarding the commercialization of valuable inventions. This result should not come as a surprise—the…

Article

Irrelevant Confusion

by  Mark A. Lemley & Mark McKenna

In 2006, thousands of soccer fans showed up to the World Cup game between the Netherlands and the Ivory Coast wearing pants in the colors of the Dutch national team. The pants had been given out as promotional gifts by a beer company. FIFA, the governing body of international soccer, objected. It claimed trademark rights…

Article

The Disintegration of Intellectual Property?

A Classical Liberal Response to a Premature Obituary
by  Richard A. Epstein

This Article plays off the title of Thomas Grey’s well-known article, The Disintegration of Property, which argued in part that the ceaseless consensual fragmentation and recombination of property rights revealed some inner incoherence of the underlying private property institutions. I take the opposite position and treat this supposed disintegration of private property as evidence of…

Note

An Empirical Analysis of Section 1983 Qualified Immunity Actions and Implications of Pearson v. Callahan

by  Greg Sobolski & Matt Steinberg

The Supreme Court's recent decision in Pearson v. Callahan marked a turning point in a judicial experiment concerning § 1983 constitutional litigation, which began in 2001 with Saucier v. Katz. The experiment involved the doctrine of qualified immunity, an immunity from suit extended to state and local government officials (and to federal officials in Bivens…

Comment

Fourth Amendment Remedial Equilibration

A Comment on Herring v. United States and Pearson v. Callahan
by  David B. Owens

The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures,” but determining what this right means and how it should be vindicated has, to put it mildly, long been controversial. In fact, because of the “wide applicability of government intrusions, ranging from countless thousands of…