SLR Online

Reply


Medical stethoscope on a modern laptop

Reply

Medical Civil Rights as a Site of Activism

A Reply to Critics
by  Craig Konnoth  

Many continue to diagnose civil rights problems and their solutions using medical frames. Are these policymakers, backed by activists, wrong to do so? The answer, according to legal scholarship that has explicitly considered the question, seems to be yes. While the legal scholarship has emphasized the harms of using medical discourse, it has not explicitly considered its benefits across social movements—and there are several. Rather than suggest that these activists have miscalculated, this Reply seeks to understand why activists and policymakers have deployed medical frames. Further, recognizing that medical discourse and the rights—and burdens—it produces are malleable, this Reply seeks to explore ways in which to further its social justice possibilities.

Volume 73 (2020-2021)

65-SLRO-41

Reply

The Obama Justice Department’s Merger Enforcement Record

A Reply to Baker and Shapiro
by  Daniel A. Crane  

This Essay is a reply to Jonathan B. Baker & Carl Shapiro’s Evaluating Merger Enforcement During the Obama Administration.

Volume 65 (2012-2013)